Archive for the ‘Monthly Instruction’ Category

Friday, February 23rd, 2018

Regarding Personal Weapons . . .

WEAPONS are tools. They are the tools of self-defense. Any so-called “martial art” that instructs in unarmed skills alone is woefully incomplete. Integral with the the study of effective unarmed close combat is the study of how to employ the following individual weapons practically and well in a dangerous emergency:

The handgun. carbine, and shotgun (in some instances the battle rifle might be included)
The fighting knife (to include any knife that might be available)
The stick (walking stick, baton-length stick, and yawara hand stick
The La Gana American Tomahawk (or similarly designed modern tomahawk)
The garrotte
All improvised weapons and “weapons at hand” (i.e. use of all commonly encountered objects and items as weapons to be used in an emergency)
Familiarization with the WWII spring cosh, the WWII smatchet (or “Fairsword”), and the thumb daggers of WWII ––– all weapons of the wartime SOE and OSS.

We have never seen the point in teaching unarmed combat without weaponry, or teaching weaponry without unarmed combat. We probably acquired our conviction in this regard from our early introduction (we were about twelve years old) to Get Tough! and to Kill Or Get Killed . . . both classics emphasizing as they did the incorporation of weapons in the combatant’s repertoire. As for the classical weaponry of the Asian martial arts, we respect the study of these implements, and appreciate that those aspiring to mastery of classical arts will certainly include appropriate training in them. However, we do not believe that training in the use of antiquated weapons is wise in a program intended for modern use by private citizens, soldiers, and law enforcement professionals. (Note: Back in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s we had a number of NYPD officers among our students. At the time, nunchucks had become popular, and were actually being carried by some bad guys who had fancied the weapon. “How do you defend against those things,” cops asked us, “short of shooting down the punk before he begins to strike?” The answer was simple ––– and very effective! A few hours training in the use of the hardwood “nightstick” that NYPD patrol officers were then issued, solved the problem. Remember, nunchucks were not originally weapons at all. They were rice-flailing sticks ––– improvised by the Okinawans to use against Japanese occupying troops. It took (and still takes!) a helluva lot of training and practice to be even marginally effective with nunchucks. Normally, someone who picks a pair up and begins to swing them ––– feeling very Bruce Leeish! ––– ends up smashing himself in the face or head. Let the martial arts classicist train to use nunchucks and the other weapons of antiquity.)

One very important thing that we emphasize whenever instructing in any personal weapon is this: Never forget that, in addition to your weapon, you still have command of your entire body, and a powerful kick can be used to make you more effective with a walking stick, a knife, a handgun at very close range, or even some improvised weapon or object-at-hand.

Weaponry and unarmed combat do not merely “go together” as individual studies for the purpose of all-round readiness and preparation for combat and defense. They truly go together very often when utilized against attack! Jabbing a punk in the eyes with a fingertips thrust can give you the opportunity to draw your sidearm. (In fact, doing so might well serve to save the life of the punk. While he stumbles for a few moments unable to see, you can step back and gain control with your handgun. As he recovers and realizes he is being held at gunpoint, and from a distance he cannot cover, he just might give up his intended purpose.).

Deluded “pistoleros” who consider their training in use-of-the-sights distance firing in competitive matches as peparation for combat shooting(!) are missing an important fact, even as they acquire their medals and feel themselves to be badasses in the making: Just about every instance when a defender uses a handgun for protection against a real attack, the range is very close; in many instances, hand-to-hand combat range. In just about no case does the range exceed about 20 feet; and more than 50% of these actual excounters occur at a distance within five feet!!!! That’s kicking distance in many cases, and a good knee-breaking kick enables a draw of the weapon. Trying to “outdraw” someone who is right there, on top of you is just plain stupid. Chop him in the throat or neck, kick him, knee him, drive a heel of the hand blowto his nose or jaw, etc. THEN draw your weapon!

The walking stick is a near ideal weapon for self-defense. In addition to a host of virtues and advantages that a walking stick offers, is this unique one: It is there, in your hand, when you are attacked. Unlike a knife or a gun that needs to be drawn from a holster or other concealment, your walking stick may (once you have been properly trained in its use) be instantly whipped into your adversary virtually anywhere on his body. Followup is naturaly and easy . . . either using unarmed actions, further stick blows, or your concealed handgun which the use of your stick has given you time to access!

Deeply consider the message here. You, all of you, must be trained and conditioned for close combat and self-defense if total readiness is the desired objective. When you are fully prepared to handle a violent emergency by bringing into play whatever weapon ––– or object ––– you have access to, AND you are able to combine your natural weapons and weaponless tactical skills effectively, then you are truly prepared!

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Tuesday, January 9th, 2018

                         Getting Back Into Training

IT is the way with all of us who have made training (in martial arts or in weight-training) a truly serious pursuit. First, we accept and happily embrace the idea that our training is a lifetime commitment. Second, every now and again we find, for whatever reason, that we have neglected our regular training and gotten (ugh!) out of shape.

A cessation of regular training is by no means necessarily due to laziness. After all, illness can intervene in anyone’s life, and getting well becomes a priority, during which time training may not be permitted for medical reasons. Or unanticipated life circumstances of all sorts might be the cause. (Yes, sometimes the cause is laziness). But regardless of why YOU have been out of training ––– or perhaps neglecting some important aspect of your training ––– we want to provide you with some assistance that will help you get back in the saddle, so to speak. We’ve been there ourself . . . and over the decades we’ve trained and coached more people than we can remember. In every instance when someone has let himself go and wants to return to his regular training, our counsel has worked for him. And we do not say this to boast; we point it out only so that you will have confidence in what we tell you. We have, in the 55-plus years that we have been immersed in these disciplines, been through enough peaks and valleys to know our way around.

One of the biggest mistakes made by those whose training had been discontinued for any length of time is to attempt to return to the routine of practice / or working out that one had last been doing, before the extended layoff. This is crazy for two big reasons. First, you won’t be able to train “as you had been training” unless you gradually build up to it. Your initial effort to duplicate the sessions of physical exertion that you once did will only lead to discouragement at the least, and injury at the worst. Don’t do it!

You can easily lose 50% of your strength with a prolonged layoff from training (with weights), and / or a good deal of your crispness and sharpness in executing skills of close combat. The simple fact is that you are not the same person you were “back then”, and it will take a period of time during which ––– if you are sensible ––– you will gradually build back up to your previous level. Note this: A brief layoff between changes in a routine, lasting perhaps a week, is not what we are referring to here. Our concern is the fellow who has gotten out of shape, and whose strength, muscularity, and skill performance level has diminshed over, let’s say, a few months or possibly even longer. Even a solid month of no training will set you back to some degree.

First off, then: resolve to begin training again at a reduced pace and effort-output. Forget about even attempting to duplicate your last best efforts and performances, before you laid off.

Because the body changes considerably over time, we feel it is wise for anyone who has been truly indolent for a long time (say, a fellow who trained hard in his late teens or in his 20’s, and who wants to get back into training now in his late 30’s or later) to get a checkup with an MD ––– just to be certain that working out regularly will be compatible with his state of health.

When you commence training after a long layoff you are going to have a problem to some degree with discipline. You may have been used to grinding out practice or P.T. sessions for an hour or more non-stop; but back then you were “in the groove”. Now, it will likely take some discipline beyond what you needed previously just to do a brief 20-30 minute session. That’s OK. So long as you in fact do the brief 20-30 minute session, momentum will build. As the days and weeks roll by you will find your strength, performance ability, discipline, and motivation improving . . . just like before! But be patient.

How long does it take for an out-of-training person to build back up? It varies. But if you set aside regular ––– bu brief! ––– practice and workout times, it really won’t be too long. Young fellows usually are back to (or beyond) where they were within a month. Older individuals might take longer. But the length of time is hardly intolerable. In fact, after a mere two weeks of resuming regular, consistent training, it will feel quite easy to continue . . . and it’s all upward from there!

The critical point is to be a realist. Be sensible, patient, and systematic. You’ll get back into shape, but not overnight. Depending upon your genetics, you may bounce back very quickly ––– or very slowly. But a bouncing back period will be necessary. Strength, condition, and motor skills cannot remain at their peak during lengthy periods of no activity. So big deal. That’s a reality we all must face and contend with. (It really does provide a wonderful incentive to keep on training and NOT allow yourself to quit for long periods of time!

You must understand that no one begins training in combat skills and progressive-resistance exercise in his teens or 20’s and continues decade after decade with ZERO interruptions or setbacks. Life is not like that. The goal is always to keep training in your life and to come back to it when and if circumstances cause a temporary cessation in your regimen.

You can do it. After all . . . you did it before, right?

                                                        –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Saturday, October 21st, 2017

Interesting And Perhaps Useful New Product

WE detest non-lethal weapons. Criminals almost never concern themselves with anything resembling “non-lethal” weaponry, preferring to stab, slash, club, or shoot their innocent victims, and to hell with whether or not they die or are maimed for life. So . . . we believe in returning the attention ––– in triplicate! SHOOT, STAB, OR CLUB the scummy bacteria to death if you have to save your life; never mind showing concern, compassion, or restraint.

There may well be a use for non-lethal aids to vicious defensive measures, however. For example, we believe it wise to carry a handful of gravel in your outer pocket. Throwing it in an aggressor’s face will not likely stop him; but it sure sets the scum up for whatever the hell savagery you are thereafter able to unleash upon him!

Another device that might hold some promise (although more expensive than gravel) is a product called “Safesound Personal Alarm”. It is a very convenient-sized little item that can be carried constantly, and is easily set off in an emergency with practically no effort. It produces a deafening 125 decibal blast that, emitted suddenly, will shock anyone save the totally deaf.

Now we do NOT advocate such a device as a “self-defense weapon”. We are prepared to consider it a possible AID to self-defense.

All students of self-defense and martial arts are familiar with the idea of shouting loudly as you defend yourself (called “kiai” ––– pronounced key’-eye) In order to shock and startle ––– and possibly freeze ––– the attacker. We urge it (as well as growling and grimacing) in American Combato (Jen•Do•Tao). Well, you can imagine the shock to one or more lumps of street sh–t when, suddenly, a piercing blast erupts from apparently nowhere, AND THEY ARE AT THE SAME INSTANT SAVAGELY ATTACKED, either with the defender’s weapon or with his trained bare hands! No doubt the loud blast will be a great help to the defender if the scum against whom he employs it do not see any indication of his bringing it into use. The seconds of utter shock and amazement that are sure to occur should tip the scales instantly in favor of the defender who accompanies the piercing noise with crippling offensive actions. The noise could easily provide the defender the opportunity to produce a concealed handgun if he is lawfully armed, or possibly a knife. Smashing the lout-scum with a walking stick immediately should be easy if they freeze for a moment when the loud noise shocks them. (Saves your voice and vocal cords, too. No need to kiai!!! Besides, with a 125 decibal blast your kiai wouldn’t be heard! Ha!).

Once again, we simply wish to suggest the possibility that this device may be useful. We certainly do not recommend it as one’s only recourse if attacked. That is false confidence in a very harmless device. To ASSIST in disorienting and setting one’s attacker/s up for a savage and destructive counteroffensive, YES. That is quite another matter. The “Safesound Personal Alarm” deserves to be considered for this function.

Loud noise is a pain in the ass. It can be much more . . . so think it over. You can check online for the product if it interests you.
Note: This product appears to have great appeal to females. We certainly agree that the piercing noise might assist in creating a diversion during an attack. However, just as is the case with males, it is STUPID and DANGEROUS to think that the noise alone will provide a certain defense against one or more determined attackers. Women armed with a solid ability in unarmed defense and who have a handgun available to them in a crisis will be prepared . . . or at least realistically prepared. It is wise to counsel any female (spouse, mother, sister, daughter, girlfriend) to this effect before allowing her to place her full confidence in a noise.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

 

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017

              The Wonderful Little S&W Snubby!

WE have two preferences for an ideal concealed carry handgun: The original Colt Commander Model (alloy frame, lightweight) in .45 ACP, and any one of the little Smith and Wesson .38 Special 5-shot snubbies.
Our preference would be for the little Centennial Model, that S&W reintroduced not long ago.

“What’s wrong with us,” one might ask. “Are we not aware that the little 5-shot revolvers can be had in the more potent .357 caliber? Why go with the .38 Special when that wallop-packing .357 can be had?”

We’ll be happy to explain.

One carries a 5-shot snubby for close range, very quick reaction defensive shooting. At close quarters combat distances (usually five feet or less; always within 20 feet) the .38 Special round will do its job if you do yours (that is, place the rounds where they belong). Modern +P and +P+ .38 Special hollow point bullets are very formidable when properly placed.

Our personal opinion is that the .357 round is a very poor choice for a two-inch barrel snubby. First, because the controllability of the .357 in a two-inch snubby is horrendous. (The kick of a snubby firing .38 Special ammunition can be stiff enough.) Second, because the actual ballistic performance of a .357 round fired from a two-inch barrel is not that different from the performance of the .38 Special +P. And using good combat point shooting, you’d likely be able to place a two-shot burst of rounds with the .38 Special before you could get that second round off with the .357. The .357 gives its excellent performance from a six or four inch barrel. That performance is affected significantly when the barrel is only two inches. If you absolutely insist on carrying a .357 when you need maximum concealment then we’d recommend finding one of the three inch barreled S&W Model 13’s or 65’s. These round butt revolvers at least offer a three inch barrel and more heft with which to assist in managing the weapon’s kick.

But back to the little .38 Special snubbies.

Alloy frame snubbies are very comfortable to carry. In .357 caliber a snobby would not be so pleasant to fire. We think an alloy framed .357 two-inch barrel snubby would be a very poor choice. You make your own decisions . . . but please keep in mind the circumstances under which you will be employing that weapon.

“Well, alloy framed .38 Special snubbies offer pretty stiff recoil, too. Besides, if you fire +P’s or +P+ ammo in them you’ll wear out the gun.

First, the .38 Special round fired from a two-inch barrel snubby ––– stiff as the kick may be ––– is not as stiff as that of the .357 round. Second, we believe that idea that you’ll “wear out your revolver” if you fire +P’s in it when the weapon has an alloy frame, is nonsense. (Besides, what’s more important to you ––– your life or your revolver’s?)

In any case, consider this:

Some time back the NYPD Firearms Unit conducted a torture test on a Smith and Wesson alloy framed .38 Special snubby. Five thousand rounds were fired through the little revolver and no damage whatever was observed to have been done to the weapon. Our suggestion: Use light loads when training, but fire at least 20 or 25 of the hot +P’s so that you get the feel of it. Then carry the hot loads for business. Your alloy framed revolver will last forever.

Remember also that the all carbon or stainless steel snubbies are very comfortable to carry constantly. They are light, and the recoil you feel with them is somewhat less than it is with the lightweight (alloy) framed models.

We may be accused by some of being old fashioned when we advocate some of these “weapons of yore” as it were. That’s fine with us.

Remember please that “newer” does not always or necessarily mean “better”.

Those little five shot snub-nosed revolvers have been around ––– and have always remained popular ––– for many, many years. No, they do not “dominate open competition”, and, whenever feasible and comfortable, we agree that it would be best to carry a full-size combat revolver or semi-automatic pistol. Yet, when the choice is to go armed with a powerful, reliable .38 Special snubby or be unarmed, because you can’t wear your customary .357 or .45 full-sized weapon, it would seem that wisdom lies in opting for the snubby.

P.S. The .38 Special round is an excellent one. It is a perfected cartridge, and certainly provides a great deal of punch . . . despite what some of the “experts” say. We have never found a detractor of the .38 Special who would permit us to shoot him with the round. Master your weapon. When you are able to employ your point shooting well with your handgun ––– and if your handgun is a .38 Special snubby ––– you’re set.

 

–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

 

Sunday, September 10th, 2017

Simplicity And Destructiveness

(Two Acid Tests Of A Technique’s Practicality And
Reliability In Real Close Combat And
Self-Defense)

WHEN it comes to evaluating the merits of any technique, whether offensive or defensive for practical application in a self-defense emergency, we cannot do better than to use the Applegate Standard ––– first published in Col. Rex Applegate’s wartime classic Kill Or Get Killed in 1942, and formulated by him:

“Will this work so that I can use it instinctively in vital
combat against an opponent who is determined to prevent
me from doing so, and who is striving to eliminate me by
fair means or foul?”

If you want an acid test for any martial arts technique, there you have it; as valuable and true in 2017 as it was in 1942.

Many of the skills taught in the classical/traditional martial arts are of questionable practical value for use in hand-to-hand combat because they are way too complicated. They can take months to learn, and will work reliably only in a training or demonstration setting when the “attacker” or “adversary” is an essentially cooperative partner. Often ––– in training or in a demonstration ––– the technique in question is applied full speed (using control not to maim the opponent) by both “defender” and “attacker”. So it appears that the technique will obviously work, since the observer sees it performed in real time. However it must be kept in mind that in the setting in which the technique is being seen ––– and applied ––– both the defender and the attacker know exactly what each is going to do, and the technique has been well rehearsed so that positioning and timing have been drilled into both parties. Essentially what is being observed is choreography.
We do not say this to diminish in the slightest the considerable skill and work that is required to perform skills in this manner. The repetitious, cooperative practice necessary demands discipline, patience, hard work, and serious trust between partners. Our point is only that as far as practical application of any technique is concerned against an unpredictable, determined, resisting enemy whom one has never seen before in one’s life, and who comes at one in a moment of surprise, when one has his mind on something aside from performing a technique, it is doubtful that many of the impressive-appearing skills could be relied upon. After all, an attacker who is real might come at you indicating that he intends one action, then switch suddenly to another!

There is an assumption too in many impressive looking “martial arts” skills that one’s series of, say, six or eight pre-planned sequential movements will actually work, and that the adversary will react in a specific way, insuring the uninterrupted, smooth completion of one’s technical moves. One must attack an enemy in a barrage and never rely upon a single action to succeed . . . but all too often the popularly practiced moves are not fierce and destructive enough, and under combat conditions it is not likely that they will usually do what one anticipates that they will do. Sequential blocking, for example; or maneuvering the adversary into position for a throw or blow; catching the attacker’s hand and wrist just right, so that he will succumb to the force of what is in actual combat a highly questionable, if impressive appearing technique.

Factors such as weather, terrain, attire, space, level or irregular ground, presence of more than one attacker, etc. etc. are not considered in passing on some (admittedly beautiful looking) skills in the dojo.

So here’s the bottom line:

When we analyze the Applegate Standard for selection and acceptance of techniques for combat we can be confident that we’ve got a winning technique if it proves to be simple and destructive.

Simple techniques are easily learned, easily retained, widely adoptable to an almost unlimited variety of circumstances and situations, and are the least likely to be effectively interfered with or countered by the enemy. (For example: We always advocate carrying a small handful of gravel ––– not sand or dirt, which can blow back ––– and flinging it into an adversary’s face. This requires only a gross body movement, will take anyone by surprise, and can be a prelude to escaping the scene, using unarmed or armed action against the adversary. Simple. Foolproof. Adoptable to all environments and situations.)

Simple techniques are gross body movements, requiring only that the user make use of the inevitable, natural, involuntary reaction of his system to danger, which we know entails the loss of the ability to render fine motor articulations. There’s no “fighting against nature” here; just going with the flow and doing the most natural actions.

Destructiveness is critical in any close combat or self-defense technique. What is at stake is life and limb ––– your or your loved one’s life and limb! ––– and you cannot possibly read the mind or determine the capabilities of any attacker or hand-to-hand adversary ahead of time.

It is well to remind readers that, under combat conditions, human beings can be shockingly difficult to stop. Little women, normally weak men, even elderly people, can explode with a resolve and tenacity under great survival stress that makes them five to ten times stronger and more resilient than they normally would be. And that refers to normally decent, everyday people from all normal walks of life. When you consider violent criminal offenders whose very lifestyles revolve around violent combat, or military adversaries, who may be battle-hardened and ––– to use a popular term ––– “tough as nails”, you can imagine how much might be needed to shut them down in an all-out encounter.

Techniques lacking destructive capability should be discarded. They may be suitable for competition, when done with proper control and according to the rules, but they are not to be called upon to save human life. Some of these techniques (i.e. control grips, restraining and come along type holds do have a definite place in the training of security people and law enforcers . . . but restraining and/or arresting troublemakers is not the responsibility of the private citizen or military person who must deal with a dangerous opponent. His responsibility is to stop his enemy and save himself or other innocent persons from being knocked out, maimed, killed, or kidnapped, etc.

We hope that this presentation assists those who are students of the more classical martial arts who wish to set up a repertoire of doable skills in case they are ever confronted by danger outside their traditional training and practice environment. Select a handful of techniques (and all of the classical systems have some) that are simple and destructive. Work on them intensively and regularly. Keep them in reserve for what both of us hope never comes to you. Enjoy whatever you like in the dojo, amongst your training partners and friends; but when and if the worst ever happens, use those skills that have met the Applegate Standard ––– and use them with every ounce of strength, speed, and determination you can generate!

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Monday, July 31st, 2017

                The Cooper Color Code: Tightening It Up

ALTHOUGH we disagree completely with the mechanics of that which he referred to as the “New Technique of the Pistol” for serious combat shooting of the handgun at close quarters, we nevertheless am grateful for learning the “Combat Color Code” when, back in the mid-1970’s, we took his Course personally, from the late Col. Jeff Cooper. In fact it was a friend’s lending us a copy of Cooper’s Principles of Personal Defense, which we regard as a masterpiece for anyone and everyone engaged in any form of self-defense training ––– with or without weapons ––– that caused us to contact Cooper in the first place. Mental conditioning For Combat had been a matter of serious study for us since the 1960’s, and when we discovered the PPD we were delighted.

Over the years we have modified how the Color Code is used for ourself and our students. Our view of all forms of armed and unarmed combat is that simple is better, and we believe that by simplifying the way the color code is utilized, we’ve simplified that particular aspect of mental conditioning for combat ––– and improved it for practical application.

Here is the Combat Color Code, invented by Jeff Cooper, and the specifics of how he taught it:

Condition WHITE: Inattentive, relaxed, paying no particular attention to anything near or around you. Unaware.
Condition YELLOW: Relaxed alert. You are paying attention wherever you go and wherever you may be to who and to what is around and near you. There is no specific cause for alarm or concern, but you remain situationally aware as you go about whatever business you may be going about. You notice as much as possible within the area where you happen to be at the time.

Condition ORANGE: Specific alert. Something/someone has attracted your attention and has caused you to consider that it/he may need to be dealt with. You remain in Condition Orange until whatever has caused you to be concerned has been explained and determined not to be a source of possible danger.

Condition RED: Alert and ready to take action! Whatever has caused you to become alarmed in Condition Orange has you convinced that yes, you may need to take serious action and ––– being guided by whatever “triggering action” you have decided must take place before you actually do neutralize the threat ––– you are ready to go! Whether armed or unarmed, if the individual(s) who has aroused your state of readiness to act decisively makes a certain triggering move or takes a certain triggering action that you have decided upon in advance, you will neutralize the threat instantly.
(Note: The “trigger” is decided by you, and will vary according to circumstances. For example, “If his hand is raised as a fist, I’m going to attack”, “If he produces a weapon I am going to shoot him”, “If these two move to block my way I am going to attack”, etc. and so on.)

That Color Code is better than excellent, and if it suits you exactly as Cooper taught it, that’s fine. But realizing how dangerous any attack can be, and understanding how simpler is always better insofar as technical or mental preparation goes, we have “tightened up” Cooper’s Color Code, so as to bring the defender “closer/sooner” to a state of readiness to drop any threat to life or limb.

Our particular belief is that Condition Orange should include being

Ready to take action! Whatever has caused you to become alarmed in Condition Orange has convinced that yes, you may need to take serious action and ––– being guided by whatever “triggering action” you have decided must take place before you actually do neutralize the threat ––– you are ready to go!

Condition Red then is ACTION! And we refer to the stages of YELLOW, OR ANGE, and RED as: Ready, set, go! Condition WHITE is, exactly as Cooper taught it, unacceptable and inappropriate to living, functioning, traveling, working, and so forth in a dangerous world. Only when you control completely the environment that you are in, know exactly who is near and around you, and understand that only those who mean you no harm can approach you, is being in Condition White justified.

We have not modified Cooper’s Color Code just to be different. With great respect for his innovation we have tried to make it even more effective for more students of self-defense, everywhere.

We note that here and there others have added something they call condition “black”, thus further complicating matters (and, we feel, just to make gullible fools believe that they have improved upon Cooper’s work). We stress again: SIMPLIFYING is what improves things in combat arts. And in the spirit of wanting to improve a great thing created by an extraordinary man, we offer our thoughts which we hope make the color code even more effective for you.

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Tuesday, July 11th, 2017

         Something To Think Seriously About

IN a way you could say that this is the foundational prerequisite of proper mental conditioning for close combat and self-defense. It also may at first blush seem to be something very obvious or easily dismissed and taken for granted. Please believe us ––– it is not necessarily obvious, and it must not be taken for granted.

We are speaking of the conviction in your mind that yes, indeed, violent aggression may come to you. If you shrug and say “Well naturally I know that; that’s why I train in self-defense skills and why I read and study the subject,” we must point out that a great deal of evidence exists that points to the likelihood that many people who train in martial arts do not in their heart of hearts truly accept, understand, feel, and believe that a serious, life-threatening attack by one or more deadly felons actually ever could be in their future. They may say that they believe it, but study of the facts points to the possibility that they may well be amongst that large number of private citizens, soldiers, and law enforcement officers who ––– at the deepest level, do not believe it.

So . . . what makes us say this, and where is there any evidence of its being true?

In our decades of research and study, which of course includes speaking with and/or reading the after-action reports of military and police professionals and private citizens who have spent considerable time, energy, and money learning self-defense both with and without weapons, we note that in more than half the cases the individuals state that they “couldn’t believe what was happening”, “it didn’t seem real”, “I felt like time slowed down and I was living a bad dream”, “nothing felt real” “I just could not believe that this guy was pulling a knife (or gun)”, “it didn’t feel real when he went to punch me (or whatever aggressive action the assailant took), and so on. Black belt experts, seasoned street cops, trained military men . . . all are among those who ––– we’d say very obviously ––– were not convinced that the awful reality of a dangerous physical attack against them would ever “really” come to them.

Psychologically this is not too much of a surprise. It is a well known phenomenon that the overwhelming majority of soldiers who go into wartime combat do not really expect to die. And yet the possibility (indeed, in some instances, the probability of not emerging from an engagement in wartime combat is often incontestably present).

Ferociously realistic training and mental indoctrination can change this and increase the fighting man’s understanding of the reality of a deadly threat, and thus make him better prepared to deal with it; but the reality of this is rare. During WWII one of the absolute fiercest and most hardened and mentally conditioned units was the USMC’s Raiders. Interestingly, although the Raiders were routinely outnumbered by the Japanese troops that they fought, and the regular infantry marines were often not outnumbered, there were fewer losses percentage-wise amongst the Raiders than there was amongst the regular infantry. Years ago a former USMC Raider ––– a veteran of the Makin Island Raid ––– told us: “We were ready to die if death came, and we knew the Japs were ready to kill us. So we attacked and killed them because we knew that this was it; it was real, and we had one chance and one job to do.” We did clean up the grammar a bit, but we report the essence of the statement made to us. Please note: “. . . we knew the Japs were ready to kill us . . .” We have no doubt that this acceptance of exactly how great and real a threat they faced accounted for their incredible success and their comparatively small loss of men. When you know, understand, believe, and appreciate the reality and nature of exactly what you are facing you have the greatest chance dealing with it effectively.

And that’s the point we wish to hammer home. More precisely, we want you to “hammer it home” ––– into your subconscious mind, your motor nerves, and your reflexes!
It can come to you.

Naturally we hope that violence never intrudes upon our lives and the lives of those we love. But as students of self-defense we are “switched on” to the reality that the world we live in is hardly one big Disneyland. We realize that when we are out and about in that ocean of humanity out there wherever we work, attend school, go for recreation, seek to enjoy time with those we love, etc., we will not always or necessarily encounter some friendly Charlie The Tuna; it may well be JAWS, and because we anticipate this possibility occurring one day, we will not be taken by surprise if it happens. We will be ready. We will not experience, when that awful moment arrives and some worthless, subhuman scumbag suddenly comes at us, that state of bewilderment expressed by the words, “I can’t believe this! This can’t be happening to me!” We will instead react with a mindset that knew this occurrence was always possible, and that now commands us to bring into play those techniques and skills that we have worked so hard and long to develop.

Anyone feeling that he needs or would like to avail himself of really intensive mental conditioning should obtain our self-hypnosis CDs. Check out the list.We have carefully prepared a set of 20 that more than adequately covers the mental barriers to total mental conditioning for close combat and self-defense.

Just know and do not ever forget that we live in a world that is neither safe nor friendly. Disgracefully, one of the more hideous dangers that we humans all face is the danger of being attacked physically by self-inducedly inhuman members of our own species ––– i.e. dangerous, despicable, predatory savages. The death toll from scummy excuses for “people” who kill their own kind (unlike, we note with raised eyebrows, creatures in the animal kingdom who do not attack and kill members of their own species!) is akin to the death tolls from some dread diseases.

One day, if mankind ever survives this insane-asylum-masquerading-as-human-society, our mentality and morality will have risen to the point where we cease to tolerate predation by members of our species, and we react to them when they surface as we react to rabid, feral rats. But that day appears to be a long way off, if indeed it ever comes.

But adjusting the attitude of human society is not and need not ever be thought of as your or our individual concern. JUST WORK ON YOUR PERSONAL, INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDE, AND YOUR MINDSET; AND BEGIN BY REALIZING THAT THAT WHICH YOU ARE TRAINING TO COPE WITH MAY IN FACT ONE DAY REALLY COME TO YOU.

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

 

Saturday, June 24th, 2017

Defending A Loved One (Family Member, Etc.)

 

OF all the nightmarish scenarios that could happen for which the avid student of self-defense strives to prepare, surely one in which he is not alone but with one or more loved ones, and must defend them as well as himself against the scumbag(s) attacker(s) qualifies as a matter that heads the list.

Many of us are fortunate enough to have one or more persons in our life for whom we would give our life, if that became necessary in order to save and protect them. Thus the thought of being in a situation where not merely oneself, but also someone one loves and cares for, is placed in potentially lethal danger, is horrific. We actually pity anyone whose life is so barren that his only concern, his only focus, his only human value, is himself.

In any case, the matter of defending someone you love when, while with them, the ugly situation arises where you must deal with an unavoidable attack that imperils you both.

This matter is rarely if ever addressed in martial arts courses, and even when it is addressed it is usually glossed over too briefly. We can see why. The situation is none too favorable, even for the black belt expert in a quality combatives system.

This problem differs from the relatively  easily solved one of coming to the aid of a third person in two ways:

First, when coming to the aid of a third person you have the element of surprise in your favor and normally a quite clear opening to neutralize the offender. The attacker’s focus is on his intended victim; you can nail him without his knowing what hit him.

There is no element of surprise (save possibly that of your mere resistance to the attack alone, which very often can enable you to turn the tables —— even on a group of savages —— when undertaken with sound tactics and a killing attitude. But you as well as your loved one are the targets in the type of predicament we are discussing, and you may be the primary target (the savages thinking that once you are out of the way they can easily go after your spouse, etc.)

Second, coming to the aid of a third person is not necessarily as desperate and terrifying to you as is the prospect of a loved one’s victimization. Even when only your loved one is under attack and you can employ coming-to-the-aid-of-a-third-party tactics, there is still the horrific personal factor of knowing WHO IS IN IMMINENT, PERHAPS DEADLY DANGER. It’s always different when the welfare of someone you love hangs in the balance.

Here’s what we recommend when thinking and training for defending a loved one in a street attack or other situation.

1. Have a Plan

With violent, atrocious crime literal rampant in urban America today it is shocking but true that most citizens give little thought to preparing for an encounter —— just in case one ever occurs. Being out with family members or good friends is today being vulnerable. Because of this you should discuss and prepare with your wife, children, parents, etc. what will you do if the worst really does happen? Having a plan provides some peace of mind and at least leaves you and yours with the assurance that you know what you’ll do in case of a catastrophic event.

2. Make the Plan Realistic

Noncombatants can’t offer much help in an attack. First, because they don’t know what to do, and haven’t the skills by which they can be expected to do anything. Second because they are subject to being beaten or murdered as helpless standing targets. This naturally floods your mind with concern for their safety, and thus detracts from your focus on dealing with the scum.

If possible in any confrontation the noncombatants should escape the scene while you attack and do whatever you can to neutralize the aggressor(s). If you know that your loved one is escaping the scene then your mind will be cleared to concentrate on destroying the threat.

If your loved ones are competent in combative skills then the plan should be to attack the single or multiple scumbags with force-to-kill. Ideally, you will all be armed with handguns which you know how to employ; but the reality is that —— at best —— only you will have a sidearm, and often you won’t. If you live in a violent toilet like NY, LA, Chicago, etc. the chances are you will have no firearm.

3. Review and Rehearse Your Plan

In many instances an enthusiast of combat skills will need to go to some lengths to get reluctant family members to do this. We’d say it was worth it trying as hard as possible to break through the barrier of indolence that they may set up.

4. Become Very Familiar With Good, Basic Security Measures

This goes for everyone in your family, even those who have no interest in learning combat skills.

5. Go As Well Armed As Circumstances Permit

If you can legally do so, carry a handgun with which you are competent in combat shooting. But carry something. A walking stick, a knife, etc. Punks and assorted street scum always carry weapons and, like hyena, normally travel and attack in packs. So be prepared, when protecting those you love, to use the most extreme armed violence of which you are capable.

6. Use Common Sense

(We often wonder why it is referred to as “common sense”, since its possession is so uncommon!) Go to extremes to avoid places where scum hangs out or where violence is especially common. Always be extra alert, extra cautious, and extra-ready when with someone who depends upon you for protection.

7. Priorities

Violent scum deserves to be destroyed. Whenever you are compelled to act in defense of a vulnerable loved one, remember that ANYTHING GOES because you cannot possibly predict how much trauma the person you need to protect can withstand. Show no mercy, compassion, forbearance, humanity, decency, or care for the attacker(s). ATTACK with lethal intent. More than you is at stake here, please remember. You have only one, single priority: Make sure that your loved one is uninjured, and if possible yourself, also. That’s it.

Question: “What about employing bodyguard tactics to protect a loved one?”

Answer: Effective bodyguarding almost always requires a team, and —— frankly —— that team is expendable. Its only function is to shield the principle, and effect a successful evacuation of the principle from the scene of the attack. Such “return fire” or other force that one or more team members direct against the attacker(s) is done entirely to facilitate the “cover-and-evacuate” strategy. When you are with a loved one and must act to defend that person you are acting alone, and you ar also acting, secondarily, to protect yourself. The predicament is different. It is very, very personal.

We have worked as a bodyguard and we have trained bodyguards. We do not recommend attempting to use bodyguard tactics in the situation we are addressing here.

                                                                ———————————————————————

Saturday, April 22nd, 2017

                       Physical Training For Close

                         Combat And Self-Defense

WE were recently shown some apparent promotional material for “Cross Fit”, a popular physical training activity about which we have been aware for some years now. In our personal opinion this approach to physical training is NOT  good. We vigorously recommend against it. That doubtless will do nothing to deter people from participation in Cross Fit, and that’s not our concern. We’ve said our piece; now do whatever you wish.

What prompted our writing this present piece is the fact that within the promotional literature that our friend gave us was mention of Cross Fit being followed by martial artists, and it being well suited to those who are involved in martial arts training.  How unfortunate, as we see it, if those training in combat arts are drawn to Cross Fit because they believe it to be especially well suited for their requirements. Hold it!

The reality is that there is no single best “martial arts-oriented” physical training program. There are many physical training, exercise, and fitness systems that work beautifully in conjunction with that which is our specialty (i.e. close combat and self-defense), and it is simply not true to insist otherwise.

We happen to be very partial to all round sensible weight training programs, using adjustable barbells and dumbells. These programs build every desirable physical quality, and provide strength training that we feel is particularly important in man to man combat. We absolutely concede that the use of Nautilus machines, gymnastics, rock climbing, regularly swimming laps, and rugged courses of calisthenics training are also all excellent for use in conjunction with hard training in close combat and personal defense. During WWII our Marine Raiders trained with rifle P.T. (using their M1 Garands) calisthenics, log P.T., obstacle courses, and climbing/rappelling in conjunction with their “combat judo”. They did just fine! The British Commandos and American Rangers also worked with log P.T., tough obstacle courses, and climbing skills combined with their hand-to-hand combat. The “Devil’s Brigade” (The First Special Service Force) similarly trained with calisthenics, climbing, running, and negotiating obstacle courses, as they were taught the O’Neill System of hand-to-hand combat by Pat O’Neill, himself.

Using a barbell and dumbells is convenient, simple, easily accomplished at home —— even in a small apartment —— and takes relatively little time. It is safe when properly done, and the results are always impressive. It is  a P.T. method suited to the needs of the modern individual who is not training in an elite military unit, and who cannot even join a good gym. With just a few hours of quality weight training a week, the combat arts student can enjoy total physical development, to include health-building and the increased self-confidence that comes from actually seeing oneself grow stronger as one becomes more skilled in techniques.

If you wish to build yourself up for outstanding ability in close combat and self-defense, then simply build yourself up. We’d urge weight training, but if you enjoy any other all-round exercising method and can do it regularly, go for it.  The exception, in our opinion, is Cross Fit.

We are well aware of Cross Fit’s enthusiastic following. We believe that adults must be left free to do that which they personally choose to do, and so we have no desire to see Cross Fit “banned”. However we are aware of certain potential very dangerous possible results of doing Cross Fit that have affected some people, and we do not wish to see anyone so harmed. We know from our own personal training experience and from training thousands of others over the years that the simple, basic non-frantic weight training workout that utilizes basic exercises, progressive resistance, strict form, adequate rest between sets, sensible time limits, balanced body work, rest, a good diet, and a healthy attitude, will provide the greatest, surest, lifetime training benefits to all who participate. We also know the serious potential for harm that doing Olympic type lifts entails. In fact it was the genius Arthur Jones (inventor of the Nautilus Machines) who warned that —— over time —— Olympic lifting causes damage to just about every single individual who participates in it; even those whose natural physical structure and capability is favorable for doing the lifts when they are youngsters.

“There are plenty of people who will laugh at all this and go right on enjoying their Cross Fit workouts. That’s fine with me. There are a lot of people who, in their 80’s, still smoke three packs of cigarettes a day and scoff at the idea that doing so is harmful. So long as I am free to avoid smoking —— and Cross Fit —— I say “do what you will”, But I do want to give my visitors my best, honest advice, based upon a lifetime of participatory and teaching experience.

1. Weight training provides a simple, inexpensive, convenient, and certain means of building up physically in every way. We’d recommend it for all who train in self-defense.

2. If you enjoy and prefer an activity other than weight training, so long as it works your entire body well, you do it regularly, and it combines well with your close combat training, that is perfectly acceptable. There is no special “martial arts p.t. program” for everyone.

3. We suggest —— rather strongly —— that you avoid Cross Fit (as well as Olympic lifting).

 

Combat training certainly contributes to overall fitness and well being, but it is wise to supplement your combat training with a definite program of physical training.

Hope we’ve helped you to a useful understanding of the right way to do it.

 

____________________________________

Saturday, March 4th, 2017

             A Quick Lesson In Developing Mental 

                      Readiness For Self-Defense

These are the things that make a violent offender; they are also the the things that make a violent offender dangerous:

1. Internal rage; unresolved hatreds, resentment of others, dissatisfaction, pervasive anger.

2. Absence of compassion, empathy, sympathy, or feeling for others

3. Intense sensitivity to what he perceives to be disrespect

4. No feeling for the humanity and life of another person. Indifference to others’ well-being, suffering, right to life

5. Real satisfaction and often pleasure in hurting, subjugating, and terrorizing others; and delight in injuring and stealing from them through the use of force

6. If  a psychopath, then no conscience whatever regarding injuring or killing others

    If not a psychopath, a primary desire to get away with his actions despite any inklings of conscience; resentment toward any pursuers or punishers

7. In most cases he has acquired perhaps unskilled or crude acts of violence against others, and had no hesitation about injuring or killing them on impulse, with not a tremor of consideration or “ascertaining” that such violence is even partially justifiable

8. No respect for the law or convention, or commonly held standards of appropriate behavior; unconcern about obtaining, carrying, and using firearms regardless of what the law or local ordinances decree

Decent people who come to the study of self-defense are as unlike the violent offenders against whom they seek to acquire reliable defense skills as a domesticated dog is different than a wolf. There may be a surface similarity between the two, but there the likeness ends!

For many decent people the very thought of seriously injuring or killing another person —— even in overwhelmingly justifiable, legal self-defense —— is traumatizing; and even while becoming reasonably adept at the mechanics of armed and unarmed personal defense, these people never acquire the mindset and mental conditioning necessary to actually USE what they have acquired —— for real, and when necessary.

Mental conditioning and the combat mindset determine that the person who has learned self-defense will use it.

There have been many instances when people trained in martial arts have frozen and done nothing when the need for them to use what they had acquired arose. Confronting the creature that is a violent offender is unlike confronting training buddies or a professional teacher, and despite his training the student who has learned self-defense remains unready to confront the “wolf”.

Effective and reliable mental conditioning for self-defense and close combat is possible. We have been doing it successfully with all sorts of good people for decades now. It is integral to our unarmed and armed combat instruction (American Combato [Jen•Do•Tao]). As a trained and licensed hypnotherapist for 30 years we have produced a comprehensive set of self-hypnosis CDs that cover all aspects and facets of mental conditioning for close combat and defense emergencies. As a professional instructor of combat arts for 50 years+ we have developed a unique method of group class instruction that conditions students’ minds for combat, as well as their bodies.

Presently, we wish to explain in simple terms what is necessary in order to be fully prepared mentally to use the combat-defense techniques that you learn. Providing you are training in a modern, viable, true combat system, proper mental readiness will do the rest!

Reread the list of eight things that characterize the violent offender. You don’t have them, do you? In fact you almost certainly don’t number anyone who does have them among your friends, do you?

Therein lies a big part of your problem: The very things that make the offender dangerous, and that drive you to be concerned about being able to defend against him stem from the fact that you DO NOT HAVE A SET OF SIMILAR CHARACTERISTICS, AND SO THE OFFENDER TRUMPS YOUR DECENT, “NORMAL” ATTITUDE AND APPROACH TO LIFE. HE – THE OFFENDER – POSSESSES THAT WHICH YOU NEED TO ACQUIRE.

Let us clarify:

You certainly do not want or need to revise your character and mental attitude so that you are an approximation of the violent offender, in general. However, you do need to understand fully the wild beast’s (i.e. the offender’s) mindset AND ADOPT IT IN REGARD TO THE VIOLENT OFFENDER. In other words, transform yourself so that you ————

— Have a hateful, white-hot, burning rage and resentment toward violent criminal offenders

— Abolish and rid yourself 100% of compassion, humanity, empathy, care, sympathy, forbearance, and even basic human decency insofar as every violent offender —— from bully to terrorist —— is concerned. That category of human debris merits no more consideration than the AIDS virus. It is to be extinguished, and given no more consideration than a roach on a picnic table

— Elevate your sensitivity to approaching danger by cultivating mistrust, suspicion, and extreme wariness in regard to all whom you do not know, personally. You can be polite. You can be respectful on the surface. But always be prepared for any stranger to pose a dangerous threat. The, when and if a stranger ever does, you will not be shocked; you will be ready

Ruthless disregard, and an utterly merciless, savage, and brutal attitude must be cultivated and maintained toward all who would harm you or yours. Be fully decent and caring toward others who are decent and caring; but drop your humanity the very second that you realize you are dealing with a dangerous predator. As was shouted to our troops as they departed for Europe in world war one: GIVE ‘EM HELL!

— Do not avoid or deny cultivating a sense of supreme satisfaction at winning over and destroying a predator. Why ought you not derive satisfaction from ruining some scum who would —— purely to delight himself —— ruin you?

— Get it finally and forever into your head that the violent offender and not you is responsible for whatever damages he suffers as a result of your successfully crushing him and his unprovoked attack against you. If he is crippled for life, or dies, well, he asked for it. You were simply protecting yourself. No need to care, or to give a damn in the least

WORK AND TRAIN INCESSANTLY IN THE FINEST WAR-PROVEN COMBAT SKILLS KNOWN! BUILD A COMBATIVE SUPERIORITY that enables you, when you must, to tower over any scumbag offender who endangers your life and well-being. Be able to do things that he has no idea of; that he has no idea that you can do. Be ready to instantly overwhelm and beat your attacker —— even as he would beat you —— without mercy, relentlessly, and finally. Let him suffer a retaliation on the spot that leaves him KAPUT!

— While you should normally be scrupulous about obedience to the law, careful not to disregard decency and local ordinances, an emergency situation must be dealt with by EXPEDIENCY so as to insure your victory. There is real wisdom in the popular saying: “Better tried by twelve than carried by six”. First comes your or your loved ones’ safety, security, and protection. Violent bastards and street scum either have no regard whatever for the law, or they “worry about it later” after devastating a victim. To damn hell with them. When they intrude into your life, they get destroyed.

Granted, some will find transitioning from a “decent person” to a “decent person who is well able to deal with indecent scum a serious challenge. DO IT ANYWAY. You really do owe it to yourself and to all who you love and care for; and to all who love and care for you.

Study proven combat skills.

Make sure that you’re ready, willing, and able to use them if you ever must.

Our self-hypnosis programs can help you if you feel that you need help, and are not one of our personal students. Maybe you can manage it on your own. But get it done.

One day you and everyone important to you may say a prayer of thanks that we led you —— perhaps “nudged you” —— to do so.

                        ———————————————